You are here
Arts Film 

2001 in 2010: a film review

Lolita Starchild: Lady Gaga Song Title or Thomas Pychon Character?

Saw “2001:a space odyssey” at the TIFF Lightbox last night . The print is near pristine and this really is a “must see” item. Some thoughts;
1- Helvetica is a beautiful font and should be revived whenever possible.
2-Hal 9000 or Richard III; who is is the biggest jerk?
3-Hal 9000 or Norman Bates; who is the sickest puppy?
4-I can see (hear) why György Ligeti sued Kubrick for the way he had “Atmospheres” mixed in the soundtrack- that’s a lot of reverb there Stanley. I’m suprised that you didn’t just shove to whole piece into a phase shifter.
5-My son Reid thought that the humans were very rude to Hal,”They only say please if he doesn’t do something the first time.” No wonder he’s got issues with Frank and Dave.
6-Long range space travel might may be hazardous to your humanity.
7-The aliens in Vonnegut’s “Slaughter House Five” were way kinder to Billy Pilgrim than the ones that Dave Bowman fell in with. Sticking a guy for the rest of his life in a swank  hotel room like that with room service but no escort service…that’s very small minded. There are things about us that the aliens just don’t get.
8-Kubrick did not direct the faked Apollo moon landings…NASA got one look at his budget and schedule and realised that it would be cheaper and faster to actually do it “for real” even if it would never look as cool.
9- The physics of Bowman’s attempt to rescue Poole has me wondering if you could do that- i.e. take off at an angle to your forward momentum, retrieve something and then head back without boosting your thrust to match a very fast  interplanetary spacecraft. Damn! Those “pods” must be capable of short thrusts that would beat an Imperial TIE Fighter and even make an X-Wing sweat. Cool, I want one.
10-Why didn’t Aurora Plastics release a model kit of the monolith? There was just enough irony in the late Sixties to have made it a hit. There’s even more irony now. It could still be a hit.

Addendum: My favourite Kubrick film is actually “Lolita” (and not for the salacious stuff- it’s a great movie about guilt plus Peter Sellers  and Shelly Winters are amazing). He was still interested in humans back them. The scene in 2001, where Bowman is sketching the inside of the ship’s “habitation ring” reminded me of how Nabokov wrote that “the initial shiver of inspiration” for Lolita “was somehow prompted by a newspaper story about an ape in the Jardin des Plantes who, after months of coaxing by a scientist, produced the first drawing ever charcoaled by an animal: this sketch showed the bars of the poor creature’s cage”.

Kubrick’s work can still “bug” people, years later, and that is a very real kind of greatness.

Related posts

5 thoughts on “2001 in 2010: a film review

  1. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Doug Groves, rgbFilter. rgbFilter said: 2001 in 2010: a film review: Saw “2001:a space odyssey” at the TIFF Lightbox last night . The print is near pris… http://bit.ly/gbU4bq […]

  2. Anonymous

    Well, I’m no physicist, but the pods would “inherit” the velocity of the main ship so it wouldn’t be moving relative to them and they’d just need tiny little thrusts to move around it. It’s like how we feel like we’re sitting still even though we’re zipping around the universe at millions of miles an hour. But ya, it took me a long time to wrap my head around it too. And those EVA trips seemed insanely dangerous. Why go out so far? One wrong move and you’re spinning in space for eternity.

  3. 575637 530600Thank you for the auspicious writeup. It in reality was a amusement account it. Look complicated to far delivered agreeable from you! Even so, how can we keep in touch? 218858

  4. 550672 387307This is an superb article and I entirely comprehend where your coming from in the third section. Perfect read, Ill regularly follow the other reads. 876122

  5. 914878 53210I like this weblog it is a master piece! Glad I discovered this on google. 544954

Leave a Comment